RPC Visibility Report - June 2026

A monthly look at Ethereum RPC visibility across monitored regions: where blocks appeared first, how large regional timing gaps became and when freshness thresholds were crossed.

New metric: stale-view exposure

This report introduces stale-view exposure: how often a region lagged the fastest observed region for the same block by more than a threshold.

Read the explainer →

Key Findings

  • US-East remained the leading first-seen region, accounting for 41.95% of blocks across 6 monitored regions, about 2.5x the equal-share baseline.
  • Regional first-seen share shifted materially month over month: EU-West fell by 13.12 percentage points, while AP-Northeast gained 11.67 points and EU-Central gained 5.42 points.
  • Typical regional visibility improved: the median first-to-last regional gap decreased from 130ms to 98ms, while p95 improved from 261ms to 211ms and p99 improved from 324ms to 276ms.
  • The extreme tail worsened: the worst first-to-last regional visibility gap increased from 7.85s last month to 22.74s this month, despite stronger median, p95, and p99 performance.
  • Severe stale-view exposure remained rare: every monitored region stayed below 0.02% of observed blocks above the 500ms threshold.
Top First-Seen Share
41.95%
US-East across 6 monitored regions
Worst Visibility Gap
22.74s
~232x the 98ms median regional gap
Severe Stale-View Exposure
<0.02%
All regions above the 500ms threshold
Typical Regional Gap
98ms
Down from 130ms last month
Coverage: 215,140 blocks were observed across all monitored regions.

1. Regional First-Seen

For each block, QuantLoop reports which monitored region observed the block first.

How to read this
Expand

This section answers: which monitored region observed each new Ethereum block first?
Because each region has multiple monitored providers, QuantLoop uses the earliest observation recorded inside each region.

Values labeled "pts vs last month" show the percentage-point change from the previous monthly report.

First-Seen Share by Region
Share of blocks first observed by each monitored region.
US-East41.95%-1.01 pts vs last month
EU-West11.58%-13.12 pts vs last month
EU-Central25.13%+5.42 pts vs last month
AP-Northeast17.79%+11.67 pts vs last month
US-Central2.08%-2.78 pts vs last month
US-West1.47%-0.18 pts vs last month

2. Elevated Regional Lag

Time windows where one region repeatedly received blocks later than the fastest region.

How to read this
Expand

This section highlights detected lag windows where one region repeatedly received blocks later than the fastest region.

Each row covers one detected lag window. QuantLoop counts how many blocks in that window were delayed by more than 250ms for the listed region.

Share shows how much of the window was affected. Higher share means more persistent lag.

Highest regional lag windows
Detected lag windows ranked by the percentage of blocks affected.
Rank #1
US-West
2026-06-10 19:41-19:56 UTC
Delayed
26.67%

20 / 75 blocks were delayed >250ms

P95 lag

460ms

Max lag

2.44s

Rank #2
US-West
2026-06-13 17:58-18:58 UTC
Delayed
19.0%

57 / 300 blocks were delayed >250ms

P95 lag

344ms

Max lag

2.81s

Rank #3
US-West
2026-06-05 13:15-14:15 UTC
Delayed
17.67%

53 / 300 blocks were delayed >250ms

P95 lag

406ms

Max lag

2.05s

3. Stale-View Exposure

How often each monitored region lagged the earliest regional observation by more than 250ms or 500ms.

How to read this
Expand

This section answers: how often did each region fall materially behind on block visibility?

For each block, QuantLoop compares each region's earliest observation with the earliest regional observation of that same block.

Stale-view exposure by region
Share of observed blocks where regional visibility latency exceeded 250ms or 500ms.
Region
US-East
>250ms
0.231%
>500ms
0.008%
Region
EU-West
>250ms
0.143%
>500ms
0.007%
Region
EU-Central
>250ms
0.261%
>500ms
0.018%
Region
AP-Northeast
>250ms
0.261%
>500ms
0.010%
Region
US-Central
>250ms
0.331%
>500ms
0.014%
Region
US-West
>250ms
1.637%
>500ms
0.017%

4. Missing Observations

For each region, QuantLoop measures how often expected provider observations were missing.

How to read this
Expand

This section measures completeness, not latency.

For each canonical block and region, QuantLoop expects one observation from each monitored provider. In this report, that means 7 expected provider observations per block per region.

  • Missing observation: an expected provider observation that was not recorded inside the report window.
  • Missing observation rate: the share of expected observations that were not recorded. Lower values mean more complete provider visibility.

A missing observation is not an outage label. It only means QuantLoop did not record the expected observation during the report window.

Missing observations by region

US-East

Missed obs.

67

Missing rate

0.004%

EU-West

Missed obs.

57

Missing rate

0.004%

EU-Central

Missed obs.

585

Missing rate

0.039%

AP-Northeast

Missed obs.

422

Missing rate

0.028%

US-Central

Missed obs.

474

Missing rate

0.032%

US-West

Missed obs.

559

Missing rate

0.036%